Atlassian Rovo in Mid-Sized Companies: How gen. KI Finds Knowledge, Coordinates Work, and Speeds Up Decisions

Many mid-sized companies today do not suffer from a lack of information, but from a lack of overview.

Knowledge sits in project spaces, tickets, documents, chats, and emails. Decisions take longer because follow-up questions, alignment loops, and searching consume time.

Atlassian rovo addresses exactly this: as a KI-supported assistant within the Atlassian environment, designed to find knowledge faster, condense content, and reduce day-to-day workload for teams.

For owners, managing directors, and department heads, the goal is not “more technology”, but measurable Nutzen: less time spent searching, less friction at interfaces, and faster, better-informed decisions.

What Atlassian Rovo is – and what it is not

rovo is a KI capability in the Atlassian ecosystem. Employees can ask questions in natural language and receive condensed answers with references to relevant sources.

Typical tasks where rovo supports teams:

• finding information across multiple sources

• summarising content (e.g., project status, ticket history, decision documents)

• structuring first drafts (e.g., handovers, status updates, to-do lists)

Important for expectation management:

• rovo does not replace processes.

• rovo does not replace accountability.

• rovo does not fix poor data – it only makes problems visible faster.

The Nutzen emerges when content is maintained, responsibilities are clear, and teams know what belongs where.

Where the business Nutzen is created

In practice, the effects for mid-sized organisations can usually be grouped into three Nutzen areas.

1) Faster orientation

• less time searching for “the right document”

• fewer follow-up questions (“Who knows this?”)

• faster onboarding of new employees

2) Better execution

• clearer tasks and next steps

• fewer handover errors between teams

• more consistent documentation for recurring workflows

3) Greater controllability

• better transparency on status, dependencies, and risks

• faster preparation for steering meetings

• fewer surprises caused by missing information

The leverage is particularly high if your organisation is project-driven, needs to coordinate multiple teams, or deals with recurring alignment (e.g., product development, IT/operations, customer projects, transformation programmes).

Typical mid-market problems – and how rovo helps in concrete terms Knowledge exists, but cannot be found

Often, knowledge is spread across Confluence pages, Jira tickets, emails, or files. Employees spend time searching or asking colleagues instead of reliably using a single source.

How rovo helps:

• answers questions based on existing content

• guides users to the relevant passages (instead of only returning “hit lists”)

• reduces duplicate work because existing material is found faster

Pragmatic starting point:

• Define 3–5 “business-critical knowledge domains” (e.g., project status, operations documentation, customer requirements, policies).

• Start there, rather than opening everything at once.

Status reporting consumes time and still remains unreliable

Many reports are created manually, arrive late, or depend on a few individuals. This triggers follow-up questions and costs time for both leadership and teams.

How rovo helps:

• condenses information from tickets and pages into a coherent status picture

• provides consistent summaries for recurring questions

• makes gaps visible (e.g., missing risks, unclear owners)

Prerequisite:

• Jira fields and the level of maintenance must match your steering needs.

A proven minimum set in Jira (depending on context):

• responsible person

• status / next milestones

• target date

• risks / blockers

Handovers between teams are error-prone

Interfaces create friction: sales to project delivery, project to operations, product to support. In handovers, context, decisions, or the “why” behind a solution are often missing.

How rovo helps:

• creates structured handover summaries from existing information

• supports deriving checklists (“What still needs to be clarified?”)

• reduces the risk that important points are overlooked

Important: this does not replace accountability – it lowers the probability of gaps.

Pragmatic starting point:

• Define a minimum set of information per interface (e.g., Definition of Ready/Done).

• Anchor it in workflows and templates.

Data flows and governance: the three decision-maker questions

KI Nutzen does not come from a demo, but from your data flows and rules.

1) What is the “single source of truth”?

If the same information is maintained in multiple places, contradictory answers will occur.

A proven split:

• Jira: tasks, status, responsibilities, operational steering

• Confluence: decisions, concepts, policies, knowledge articles

2) Which overlaps are intentional?

Overlaps are not automatically bad. A decision can be documented in Confluence and linked in Jira as a ticket.

What matters is:

• unambiguous relationships (linking instead of duplicate maintenance)

• clear rules on where updates happen

3) Which content may be processed?

In the DACH mid-market, data protection, confidentiality, and co-determination are often critical to success.

This is less a technical question and more a leadership task:

• roles and permissions

• approvals for sensitive areas

• clear rules on which content is stored in which spaces

Guiding principle:

The clearer your information architecture, the higher the Nutzen of rovo. The more unclear responsibilities and storage locations are, the greater the risk of misinterpretation.

Stärken and Schwächen: plan realistically Stärken

• speed: less searching, less alignment

• consistent condensation: standardised summaries instead of “interpretations”

• relief for routine work: structuring, summarising, first drafts

Schwächen (that you need to manage actively)

• data quality: poorly maintained tickets and outdated pages produce weak results

• context risk: KI may weight content incorrectly or overlook what matters

• adoption: if teams continue to work “in chat” instead of in the intended systems, Nutzen remains limited

Implication for leaders:

rovo is a lever, not a miracle cure. The strongest effect comes when you improve data maintenance, responsibilities, and working practices in parallel.

Two practical scenarios from the mid-market Scenario 1: Project business with many parallel projects

Starting situation:

• multiple customer projects in parallel

• Jira is used, but not consistently

• Confluence exists, but without a clear structure

• weekly reporting costs time and generates follow-up questions

Approach with rovo:

• mandatory Jira fields for status, risk, next milestones

• Confluence templates for project overview and decisions

• clear linking between pages and tickets

• rovo for summaries: “top risks, open decisions, next dates”

Typical effect:

• less time spent collecting status information

• more time for decisions

• better traceability because the data basis is transparent

Scenario 2: Operations/service with high ticket volume

Starting situation:

• many recurring requests

• knowledge is documented, but not found in day-to-day work

• long onboarding for new employees

Approach with rovo:

• short, maintained knowledge articles in Confluence (standardised)

• Jira Service Management as the central ticket source

• rovo supports finding suitable articles, summarising ticket histories, and drafting first response suggestions

Typical effect:

• shorter handling times for standard cases

• better documentation discipline

• faster onboarding

How to introduce rovo pragmatically (without “KI gimmicks”)

A lean approach in four steps has proven effective.

1) Define the target picture

• Which 2–3 decisions or workflows should become faster and more reliable?

• Which metrics matter? (e.g., search time, lead time, number of follow-up questions, onboarding duration)

2) Clarify data sources and responsibilities

• Jira as the operational source, Confluence as the knowledge and decision space

• name an owner per knowledge area (business-side, not “IT”)

3) Pilot with a clear domain

• start with one area (e.g., project status or service knowledge)

• define rules:

• what may be used directly?

• what must be checked?

• who approves content?

4) Scale and lock in standards

• templates, naming conventions, mandatory fields

• roles and permissions concept

• regular maintenance routines (short, but binding)

Conclusion: rovo delivers impact at your interfaces

Atlassian rovo can deliver the greatest Nutzen in mid-sized companies where information currently gets lost between teams, tools, and responsibilities.

If you define clear “sources of truth”, design interfaces cleanly, and ensure a minimum level of data quality, rovo becomes a realistic productivity lever:

• faster discovery of knowledge

• better handovers

• more reliable status transparency

• faster decisions on a traceable basis

This is how gen. KI becomes not an end in itself, but a tool that makes your existing work more usable and easier to steer.

---

About Arkcanis Consulting

Arkcanis Consulting GmbH is the specialized advisory unit of the Arkcanis Group. We design scalable process and data architectures for airlines, AOCs, operators, and technology-driven organizations — with a clear focus on aviation engineering, Leon integrations, Atlassian architectures, ETL pipelines, and real-time dashboards.

As the founder of catworkx GmbH — one of the largest Atlassian partners in the DACH region — Oliver Groht brings more than 25 years of experience in Jira and Confluence architecture, process consulting, and enterprise-wide scaling. He combines this background with deep technical expertise in Leon GraphQL, data engineering, Grafana, and Flight Ops workflows.

The result: measurable, transparent, and resilient structures that enable operational excellence and strengthen strategic decision-making at the management and C-level.

Contact us